The scandals of covid-19

Where clinicians once believed "there is no harm trying,” they realise that CPR offers little benefit to patients but brings significant risk to staff as they wait for the protective equipment that was promised in the UK and globally (doi:10.1136/bmj.m1423;doi:10.1136/bmj.m1367). Adding to the scandals of unpreparedness and lack of personal protective equipment is the scandal of testing. Germany's relatively low case fatality rate is helped by an "early and high level of testing” (doi:10.1136/bmj.m1395).

COVID-19-specific adult basic life support guideline strategies for chiropractors and other healthcare providers to maximize the safety and efficacy of resuscitation: a commentary.

BACKGROUND: The emergence of an unprecedented novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-C0V-2), which causes the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has created new scenarios in basic life support (BLS) management. According to current evidence, SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted airborne in aerosol particles during resuscitation. Research evidence found an alarming global increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare providers are legally obliged to respond to cardiac arrest as soon as possible. Chiropractors will likely encounter potential exercise-related and non-exercise-related cardiac emergencies at some point in their professional lives. They have a duty of care to respond to emergencies such as cardiac arrest. Chiropractors are increasingly involved in providing care, including emergency care, for athletes and spectators at sporting events. Also, exercise-related cardiac arrest in adult patients may occur during exercise testing or rehabilitation with exercise prescriptions in chiropractic and other healthcare settings. Little is known about the COVID-19 BLS guidelines for chiropractors. Knowledge of the current COVID-19-specific adult BLS guidelines is essential to developing an emergency response plan for the on-field and sideline management of exercise-related cardiac arrest and non-athletic, non-exercise-related cardiac arrest. MAIN TEXT: Seven peer-reviewed articles on the COVID-19-specific BLS guidelines, including two updates, were reviewed for this commentary. Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, the national and international resuscitation organizations recommended interim COVID-19-specific BLS guidelines with precaution, resuscitation, and education strategies. BLS safety is paramount. A precautionary approach with the bare minimum of appropriate personal protective equipment for resuscitation is recommended. There was disagreement among the COVID-19 BLS guidelines on the level of personal protective equipment. All healthcare professionals should also undergo self-directed BLS e-learning and virtual skill e-training. The summarized COVID-19-specific adult BLS guideline strategies and protocols are tabled, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This commentary provides a practical overview and highlights current evidence-based intervention strategies of the COVID-19-specific adult BLS guidelines that may help chiropractors and other healthcare providers reduce BLS-related exposures to SARS-CoV-2 and the risks of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and maximize the efficacy of resuscitation. This study is relevant to and impacts future COVID-19-related research in areas such as infection prevention and control.

Diagnostic performance of point-of-use ultrasound of resuscitation outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3265 patients.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography in the setting of resuscitation can provide information as to the cause of the cardiac arrest, as well as indicators of futility. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the value of point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) in the assessment of survival for adult patients with cardiac arrest. METHODS: This meta-analysis was performed in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane have been searched from databases inception until March 2nd 2021. The search was limited to adult patients with cardiac arrest and without publication dates or country restrictions. Papers were chosen if they met the required criteria relating to the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this diagnostic technique concerning resuscitation outcomes. RESULTS: This systematic review identified 20 studies. Overall, for survival to hospital discharge, PoCUS was 6.2% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7% to 8.0%) and 2.1% specific (95% CI 0.8-4.2%). PoCUS sensitivity and specificity for return of spontaneous circulation were 23.8% (95% CI 21.4-26.4%) and 50.7% (95% CI 45.8-55.7%) respectively, and for survival to admission 13.8% (95% CI 12.2-15.5%) and 20.1% (95% CI 16.2-24.3%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not allow unambiguous recommendation of PoCUS as a predictor of resuscitation outcomes and further studies based on a large number of patients with full standardization of operators, their training and procedures performed were necessary.

Reasons for the termination of resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea

The incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) gradually increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and the number of cases requiring termination of resuscitation (TOR) also rose. This study aimed to analyze the reasons for TOR of OHCA cases over 2 years (2019–2020). This retrospective observational study was conducted using data gathered from prehospital emergency medical service (EMS) care reports generated in Seoul between 01 January 2019, and 31 December 2020. We included OHCA cases reported to the EMS system in this study. Patients who experienced cardiac arrest for a non-medical cause and received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from EMS paramedics at the scene were excluded. The variables of demographics and comorbidities, arrest location, identity of the bystander, cause of cardiac arrest, first monitored electrocardiographic (ECG) rhythm, and reason for TOR were investigated. We compared data for 1 year before and after the start of the COVID19 pandemic. A total of 10,872 OHCAs with TOR were included in this study;of these, 6238 cardiac arrest cases were terminated without resuscitation attempts during the COVID-19 period compared to 4634 during the pre-COVID-19 period. During the COVID-19 period, the proportion of women in the total population decreased, while the median age increased (p < 0.001). Patients with comorbidities, the frequency of asystole rhythm at first monitoring, and the number of witnessed cardiac arrests significantly increased (p < 0.001). The proportion of TOR cases due to decisions made by a medical director and refusal of CPR by family members also significantly increased, while that due to clear evidence of death decreased (p < 0.001). In conclusion, there was a significant change in the reason for TOR before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Signa Vitae is the property of Pharmamed Mado Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Treatment of adult, child and newborn cardiac arrest victims with COVID-19. Recommendations from the Interamerican Society of Cardiology / Sociedad Interamericana de Cardiología (SIAC), Mexican National Cardiologists Association / Asociación Nacional de Cardiólogos de México (ANCAM) and Mexican Society of Cardiology / Sociedad Mexicana de Cardiología (SMC).

La pandemia de COVID-19 ha infligido grandes estragos a la población y en especial al personal de salud. Los esfuerzos de reanimación exigen modificaciones potenciales de las guías internacionales existentes de reanimación cardiopulmonar (RCP) debido al elevado índice de contagiosidad del virus SARS-CoV-2. Se considera que hasta 15% de los casos de COVID-19 tiene una enfermedad grave y 5% padece un trastorno crítico con una mortalidad promedio del 3%, la cual varía según sean el país y las características de los pacientes. La edad y las comorbilidades como la hipertensión arterial, enfermedad cardiovascular, obesidad y diabetes incrementan la mortalidad hasta 24%. También se ha informado un aumento reciente del número de casos de paro cardíaco extrahospitalario (PCEH). Aunque el paro cardíaco (PC) puede ser efecto de factores diversos en estos pacientes, en la mayoría de los casos se ha demostrado que el origen es respiratorio, con muy pocos casos de causa cardíaca. Se debe considerar la indicación de iniciar o continuar las maniobras de RCP por dos razones fundamentales: la posibilidad de sobrevida de las víctimas, que hasta la fecha se ha registrado muy baja, y el riesgo de contagiar al personal de salud, que es muy alto.The COVID-19 pandemic is having a large impact on the general population, but it has taken a specially high toll on healthcare personnel. Resuscitation efforts require potential modifications of the present Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) international guidelines because of the transmissibility rate of the new SARS-CoV 2 virus. It has been seen that up to 15% of COVID-19 patients have a severe disease, 5% have a critical form of infection and the mean death rate is 3%, although there are significant differences according to the country that reports it and patients' baseline conditions that include age, presence of arterial hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes or obesity. In these high risk subjects, mortality might go up to 24%. There are also reports of a recent increase in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OHCA) victims. Cardiac arrest (CA) in these subjects might be related to many causes, but apparently, that phenomenon is related to respiratory diseases rather than cardiac issues. In this context, the decision to start or continue CPR maneuvers has to be carefully assessed, because of the low survival rate reported so far and the high contagion risk among healthcare personnel.

Comparison of extended reality and conventional methods of basic life support training: protocol for a multinational, pragmatic, noninferiority, randomised clinical trial (XR BLS trial).

BACKGROUND: Conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training for the general public involves the use of a manikin and a training video, which has limitations related to a lack of realism and immersion. To overcome these limitations, virtual reality and extended reality technologies are being used in the field of medical education. The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of extended reality (XR)-based basic life support (BLS) training. METHODS: This study is a prospective, multinational, multicentre, randomised controlled study. Four institutions in 4 countries will participate in the study. A total of 154 participants will be randomly assigned to either the XR group or the conventional group stratified by institution and sex (1:1 ratio). Each participant who is allocated to either group will be sent to a separate room to receive training with an XR BLS module or conventional CPR training video. All participants will perform a test on a CPR manikin after the training. The primary outcome will be mean compression depth. The secondary outcome will be overall BLS performance, including compression rate, correct hand position, compression, and full release and hands-off time. DISCUSSION: Using virtual reality (VR) to establish a virtual educational environment can give trainees a sense of realism. In the XR environment, which combines the virtual world with the real world, trainees can more effectively learn various skills. This trial will provide evidence of the usefulness of XR in CPR education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04736888. Registered on 29 January 2021.

Out of hospital cardiac arrest during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective study from north east of Italy

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak affected the epidemiology and the outcomes of Out- Of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA). We performed a retrospective observational study in the Western district of Vicenza (Veneto, Italy) to evaluate patients affected by non-traumatic OHCA and we analyzed epidemiological and clinical characteristics associated with sustained Return Of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC). We collected 114 cases from January 2019 to May 2021 and we compared data of the pre-pandemic period (2019) with the pandemic one (2020-2021). During the pandemic we found an increase of bystander CPR, of OHCA with a cardiac cause and of shockable presenting rhythms. All these observations weren't associated with an increase of sustained ROSC, which could be determined by both the reorganization of the health care system with the reduction of medical screenings and by the interruption of training courses reducing the efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On the other hand, the higher percentage of presenting shockable rhythm reinforces the importance of bystander rule and of short time to start CPR.

Efficacy of distance training program for cardiopulmonary resuscitation utilizing smartphone application and home delivery system.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Community cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education is important for laypersons. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, with social distancing, conventional face-to-face CPR training was unavailable. We developed a distance learning CPR training course (HEROS-Remote) using a smartphone application that monitors real-time chest compression quality and a home delivery collection system for mannikins. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the HEROS-Remote course by comparing chest compression quality with that of conventional CPR training. METHODS: We applied layperson CPR education with HEROS-Remote and conventional education in Seoul during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both groups underwent a 2-min post-training chest compression test, and we tested non-inferiority. Chest compression depth, rate, complete recoil, and composite chest compression score was measured. Trainees completed a satisfaction survey on CPR education and delivery. The primary outcome was the mean chest compression depth. RESULTS: A total of 180 trainees were enrolled, with 90 assigned to each training group. Chest compression depth of HEROS-Remote training showed non-inferiority to that of conventional training (67.4 vs. 67.8, p = 0.78), as well as composite chest compression score (92.7 vs. 95.5, p = 0.16). The proportions of adequate chest compression depth, chest compression rate, and chest compressions with complete chest recoil were similar in both training sessions. In the HEROS-Remote training, 90% of the trainees were satisfied with CPR training, and 96% were satisfied with the delivery and found it convenient. CONCLUSION: HEROS-Remote training was non-inferior to conventional CPR training in terms of chest compression quality. Distance learning CPR training using a smartphone application and mannikin delivery had high user satisfaction and was logistically feasible.

Initial five and ten-minute regional cerebral oxygen saturation as a predictor of the futility of resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) during the initial 5 and 10 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared with an initial rSO2 and mean rSO2 during entire CPR to predict the futility of resuscitation for patients without of-hospital-cardiac arrest (OHCA). This was a prospective study involving 52 adult patients presenting in OHCA and whose cerebral rSO2 values were measured until either CPR was terminated or sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved. Receiver operating characteristics analyses were used to evaluate which time and type of measurement is better to predict non-ROSC. The area under the curve (AUC) of each rSO2 value according to measurement time (overall, initial 5 minutes and 10 minutes) were the highest value of 0.743, 0.724, and 0.739, mean values of 0.724, 0.677 and 0.701 and rSO2 (Changes in values of regional cerebral oxygen) value of 0.722, 0.734 and 0.724, respectively, while all of the initial values had a poor AUC (<0.7) and also were not statistically significant. The optimal cut-off value of each rSO2 values during overall, initial 5 minutes and 10 minutes were the highest value of 26% (sensitivity, 53.9% specificity, 92.3%), 24% (sensitivity, 56.4% specificity, 92.3%), and 30% (sensitivity, 61.5% specificity, 84.6%), mean value of 15.2%, 15.3% and 16%, respectively. None of the patients with a persistent rSO2 <=18% during the overall period achieved ROSC. Initial 5 minutes and 10 minutes cerebral rSO2 values an out-of-hospital-cardiac arrest (OHCA) are a better predictor in deciding the futility of CPR, compared to initial and overall measurements.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.

The effect of simulation-based flipped classroom on acquisition of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills: A simulation-based randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an essential skill required by critical care nurses. Evidence has shown that the use of a novel method called simulation-based flipped classroom (SBFC) can save training time in nursing laboratories and, to some extent, enhance social distancing during the current COVID-19 pandemic. AIM: To evaluate the effects of SBFC on nursing students' acquisition of CPR skills. STUDY DESIGN: A two-parallel prospective, single-centre, simulation-based, randomized, controlled trial. METHODS: The total sample size was 326 students. A CPR video was recorded and uploaded on Microsoft Teams channel for the SBFC group only. Thereafter, both groups demonstrated and redemonstrated the CPR procedure. Both groups were then compared according to the simulation experience satisfaction scale and CPR skills acquisition checklist. RESULTS: Two equally randomly selected groups of 163 undergraduate nursing students completed the study. The SBFC group had a significantly better satisfaction with the simulation experience than the traditional simulation (TS) group (p = 0.03). As regards the mean score of the CPR checklist after simulation, the SBFC group had a significantly higher score than TS group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SBFC using a pre-recorded video can be an effective method that can reduce the time needed for CPR clinical simulation and can be used for the CPR simulation among critical care nurses. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study provides critical care nursing educators with a deep understanding regarding the benefits and value of utilizing the SBFC method in the clinical training of CPR skills. SBFC can be used to increase critical care nurses' satisfaction and skill acquisition during CPR training.

Initiating advance care planning in New South Wales general practices using a structured conversation guide

There is variation in ACP terminology and legislation of ACDs between different jurisdictions within Australia.4 General practice is the ideal setting for ACP discussions, and evidence supports patient preference for initiation of ACP while they are still healthy in the community.5-7 The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) recommends that general practitioners (GPs) discuss ACP as part of routine care for older patients during the annual 75 years and over health assessment.8 The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for GPs to have these conversations, and there have been calls for ACP to be an integral part of pandemic health planning responses.9 Evaluating the prevalence of ACP conversations is difficult, with most studies focusing on the more tangible assessment of ACD completion. Some barriers to GPs initiating ACP include difficulties in defining the right moment to discuss the topic, a perceived lack of knowledge in the ACP process and concern regarding the potential time-consuming nature of ACP discussions.11'12 Strategies to increase initiation of ACP in general practice have focused on workshops and communication skills training for GPs and general practice nurses (GPNs), which are time and resource intensive.13-15 Some studies have shown that discussion guides and question prompt lists can improve the frequency of ACP discussions with patients, but these have been limited to palliative care settings.16-18 Most doctors believe it is their responsibility to initiate these discussions but struggle with timing.19 More evidence is needed to understand how to help GPs facilitate these conversations in a way that is acceptable and meaningful for older patients and their families. [...]it's the family that's really going to make the decision. [Female GP, FG 1.1] Some GPs preferred to focus on clinical decisions such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as the main subject of the conversation, while others preferred to broaden the discussion to general healthcare goals.

Cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the frail and multimorbid;outcomes before and during the COVID pandemic

IntroductionSARS-COV2 placed greater emphasis on identifying frail or comorbid patients early and limiting treatment where appropriate. Resuscitation guidelines changed as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was classified an aerosol generating procedure (AGP). We assessed the impact of these changes in our tertiary centre focusing on frail and/or comorbid patients.MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from contemporaneous clinical and electronic records for all patients with a recorded cardiac arrest between June 2020 and June 2021. Data collected on features of the cardiac arrest, clinical frailty scale (CFS), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), survival at discharge, 30 days and 12 months. The comparator was our previously published cohort between April 2017 to March 2018.Results62 patients studied compared to 113 in 2017–18. 20 patients survived to discharge, 30 days and 1 year. This 32.2% survival rate is higher than the 23.8% observed in 2017–18 but not statistically significant (p=0.235). Rates of ROSC similar in both studies (61.3% v 60.2% p=0.960). Median CFS was significantly lower (3.4 v 4.2, p=0.006) as was median CCI (4.1 v 5.7, p001 more patients received CPR in the cardiology department (64.5% v 38.9% p=‘0.002).'ConclusionThere was a dramatic reduction in cardiac arrest events on medical and surgical wards with little change in arrests within the cardiology department. The improvement in survival rate observed in this study is multifactorial but likely includes a less frail and comorbid population and a higher proportion of cardiac arrests in a shockable rhythm. CPR outcomes improved due to better patient selection. No evidence to show COVID ALS guidelines affect outcomes.

Evaluate the Features of Ohca Patients Living in Pakistan Both before and after the Covid-19 Epidemic in Order to Determine Their Outcomes

Aim: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) combined with public-access defibrillation has been shown to enhance overall survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This is one of top reasons of mortality across the globe. The COVID-19 global epidemic has modeled numerous problems for emergency medical services, along with reference of compression-only resuscitation also guidelines for comprehensive protective equipment. These suggestions and advice have created shortcomings and protracted fast response. On the other hand, the risk variables that determine the results of OHCA while the pandemic is ongoing are not well established. The main aim of our research remained to exploremedical features in addition results of OHCA individuals in Pakistan both before and after the COVID-19 epidemic. Method(s): The electronic medical records and paper records kept by EMS were utilized to compile the data for this single-center, retrospective observational analysis. The number of emergency hospital returns based on varying qualities in Sir Ganga Ram Hospitalized patients during and prior to the COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan were collected. Patients with OHCA who went to the emergency department at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital in Lahore before the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2019 to March 2020) were identified. Result(s): Here were a total of 145 patients who participated in this study (80 males, or 58.2% of the total;mean [SD] age, 64.7 years);64 among those individuals contributed in our currentresearch during the COVID-19 era, and 75 among those individuals contributed in our currentresearch before COVID-19 period. Bystander witnessing and method of chest compression was always the two general baseline features that were found to be substantially different between the two groups (p-values of less than 0.002 and less than 0.002, accordingly). Duringthe COVID-19 era, the ED ROSC was substantially lower than it had been before the COVID-19 period (25.68 percent vs 45.04 percent;adjusted odds ratio of 0.22;p-value less than 0.002) Survival to admission remainedsuggestivelyinferiorthroughout COVID-19 phase compared to the previous time period (26.01 percent vs 41.78 percent, accustomed odds ratio of 0.27, p-value of 0.006). On the other hand, there was no important statistically substantial difference in the 28-day survival rates (4.5% throughout COVID-19 era also 11.54% earlier COVID-19 period). Conclusion(s): Patients who had cardiac arrest outside of a hospital in Pakistan had a much lower chance of surviving long enough to be admitted during the COVID-19 epidemic that occurred there. In addition, the two groups' witness reactions and methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation couldn't have been more different from one another.Copyright © 2023, Anka Publishers. All rights reserved.

Factors associated with the arrival of smartphone-activated first responders before the emergency medical services in Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest dispatch.

BACKGROUND: First responder programs were developed to speed up access to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims. Little is known about the factors influencing the efficiency of the first responders arriving before the EMS and, therefore, effectively contributing to the chain of survival. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this retrospective observational study was to identify the factors associated with first responders' arrival before EMS in the context of a regional first responder program arranged to deliver automated external defibrillators on suspected OHCA scenes. METHODS: Eight hundred ninety-six dispatches where FRs intervened were collected from 2018 to 2022. A robust Poisson regression was performed to estimate the role of the time of day, the immediate availability of a defibrillator, the type of first responder, distances between the responder, the event and the dispatched vehicle, and the nearest available defibrillator on the probability of responder arriving before EMS. Moreover, a geospatial logistic regression model was built. RESULTS: Responders arrived before EMS in 13.4% of dispatches and delivered a shock in 0.9%. The immediate availability of a defibrillator for the responder (OR = 3.24) and special categories such as taxi drivers and police (OR = 1.74) were factors significantly associated with the responder arriving before EMS. Moreover, a geospatial effect suggested that first responder programs may have a greater impact in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: When dispatched to OHCA scenes, responders already carrying defibrillators could more probably reach the scene before EMS. Special first responder categories are more competitive and should be further investigated.

Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in "hostile" environments: Using automated compression devices to minimize the rescuers' danger.

Mechanical automated compression devices are being used in cardiopulmonary resuscitation instead of manual, "hands-on", rescuer-delivered chest compressions. The -theoretical- advantages include high-quality non-stop compressions, thus freeing the rescuer performing the compressions and additionally the ability of the rescuer to stand reasonably away from a potentially "hazardous" victim, or from hazardous and/or difficult resuscitation conditions. Such circumstances involve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, especially directly under the fluoroscopy panel, where radiation is well known to cause detrimental effects to the rescuer, and CPR during/after land or air transportation of cardiac arrest victims. Lastly, CPR in a coronavirus disease 2019 patient/ward, where the danger of contamination and further serious illness of the health provider is very existent. The scope of this review is to review and present literature and current guidelines regarding the use of mechanical compressions in these "hostile" and dangerous settings, while comparing them to manual compressions.

Impact of COVID-19 on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global public health crisis that has had a significant impact on emergency medical services (EMS). Several studies have reported an increase in the incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and a decreased survival due to COVID-19, which has been limited to a short period or has been reported in some regions. This study aimed to investigate the effect of COVID-19 on OHCA patients using a nationwide database. METHODS: We included adult OHCA patients treated by EMS providers from January 19, 2019 to January 20, 2021. The years before and after the first confirmed case in Korea were set as the non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods, respectively. The main exposure of interest was the COVID-19 period, and the primary outcome was prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Other OHCA variables were compared before and after the COVID-19 pandemic and analyzed. We performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to understand the independent effect of the COVID-19 period on prehospital ROSC. RESULTS: The final analysis included 51,921 eligible patients, including 25,355 (48.8%) during the non-COVID-19 period and 26,566 (51.2%) during the COVID-19 period. Prehospital ROSC deteriorated during the COVID-19 period (10.2% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.001). In the main analysis, the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for prehospital ROSC showed no significant differences between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 periods (AOR [95% confidence interval], 1.02 [0.96-1.09]). CONCLUSION: This study found that the proportion of prehospital ROSC was lower during the COVID-19 period than during the non-COVID-19 period; however, there was no statistical significance when adjusting for potential confounders. Continuous efforts are needed to restore the broken chain of survival in the prehospital phase and increase the survival rate of OHCA patients.

Sudden cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic: A two-year prospective evaluation in a North American community.

BACKGROUND: Early during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, higher sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) incidence and lower survival rates were reported. However, ongoing effects on SCA during the evolving pandemic have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on SCA during 2 years of the pandemic. METHODS: In a prospective study of Ventura County, California (2020 population 843,843; 44.1% Hispanic), we compared SCA incidence and outcomes during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic to the prior 4 years. RESULTS: Of 2222 out-of-hospital SCA cases identified, 907 occurred during the pandemic (March 2020 to February 2022) and 1315 occurred prepandemic (March 2016 to February 2020). Overall age-standardized annual SCA incidence increased from 39 per 100,000 (95% confidence [CI] 37-41) prepandemic to 54 per 100,000 (95% CI 50-57; P <.001) during the pandemic. Among Hispanics, incidence increased by 77%, from 38 per 100,000 (95% CI 34-43) to 68 per 100,000 (95% CI 60-76; P <.001). Among non-Hispanics, incidence increased by 26%, from 39 per 100,000 (95% CI 37-42; P <.001) to 50 per 100,000 (95% CI 46-54). SCA incidence rates closely tracked COVID-19 infection rates. During the pandemic, SCA survival was significantly reduced (15% to 10%; P <.001), and Hispanics were less likely than non-Hispanics to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (45% vs 55%; P = .005) and to present with shockable rhythm (15% vs 24%; P = .003). CONCLUSION: Overall SCA rates remained consistently higher and survival outcomes consistently lower, with exaggerated effects during COVID infection peaks. This longer evaluation uncovered higher increases in SCA incidence among Hispanics, with worse resuscitation profiles. Potential ethnicity-specific barriers to acute SCA care warrant urgent evaluation and intervention.

The Effectiveness of Online-Only Blended Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: Static-Group Comparison Study.

BACKGROUND: Basic life support (BLS) education is essential for improving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rates, but the imparting of such education faces obstacles during the outbreak of emerging infectious diseases, such as COVID-19. When face-to-face teaching is limited, distance learning-blended learning (BL) or an online-only model-is encouraged. However, evidence regarding the effect of online-only CPR training is scarce, and comparative studies on classroom-based BL (CBL) are lacking. While other strategies have recommended self-directed learning and deliberate practice to enhance CPR education, no previous studies have incorporated all of these instructional methods into a BLS course. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to demonstrate a novel BLS training model-remote practice BL (RBL)-and compare its educational outcomes with those of the conventional CBL model. METHODS: A static-group comparison study was conducted. It included RBL and CBL courses that shared the same paradigm, comprising online lectures, a deliberate practice session with Little Anne quality CPR (QCPR) manikin feedback, and a final assessment session. In the main intervention, the RBL group was required to perform distant self-directed deliberate practice and complete the final assessment via an online video conference. Manikin-rated CPR scores were measured as the primary outcome; the number of retakes of the final examination was the secondary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 52 and 104 participants from the RBL and CBL groups, respectively, were eligible for data analysis. A comparison of the 2 groups revealed that there were more women in the RBL group than the CBL group (36/52, 69.2% vs 51/104, 49%, respectively; P=.02). After adjustment, there were no significant differences in scores for QCPR release (96.9 vs 96.4, respectively; P=.61), QCPR depth (99.2 vs 99.5, respectively; P=.27), or QCPR rate (94.9 vs 95.5, respectively; P=.83). The RBL group spent more days practicing before the final assessment (12.4 vs 8.9 days, respectively; P<.001) and also had a higher number of retakes (1.4 vs 1.1 times, respectively; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a remote practice BL-based method for online-only distant BLS CPR training. In terms of CPR performance, using remote self-directed deliberate practice was not inferior to the conventional classroom-based instructor-led method, although it tended to take more time to achieve the same effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Did lockdown influence bystanders' willingness to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation? A worldwide registry-based perspective.

AIM: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) significantly increases the survival rate after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Using population-based registries, we investigated the impact of lockdown due to Covid-19 on the provision of bystander CPR, taking background changes over time into consideration. METHODS: Using a registry network, we invited all registries capable of delivering data from 1. January 2017 to 31. December 2020 to participate in this study. We used negative binominal regression for the analysis of the overall results. We also calculated the rates for bystander CPR. For every participating registry, we analysed the incidence per 100000 inhabitants of bystander CPR and EMS-treated patients using Poisson regression, including time trends. RESULTS: Twenty-six established OHCA registries reported 742 923 cardiac arrest patients over a four-year period covering 1.3 billion person-years. We found large variations in the reported incidence between and within continents. There was an increase in the incidence of bystander CPR of almost 5% per year. The lockdown in March/April 2020 did not impact this trend. The increase in the rate of bystander CPR was also seen when analysing data on a continental level. We found large variations in incidence of bystander CPR before and after lockdown when analysing data on a registry level. CONCLUSION: There was a steady increase in bystander CPR from 2017 to 2020, not associated with an increase in the number of ambulance-treated cardiac arrest patients. We did not find an association between lockdown and bystanders' willingness to start CPR before ambulance arrival, but we found inconsistent patterns of changes between registries.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on prehospital characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest among the elderly in Japan: A nationwide study.

Aim: To assess the impact of the 2020 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on the prehospital characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the elderly. Methods: In this population-based nationwide observational study in Japan, 563,100 emergency medical service-unwitnessed OHCAs in elderly (≥65 years) patients involving any prehospital resuscitation efforts were analysed (144,756, 140,741, 140,610, and 136,993 cases in 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively). The epidemiology, characteristics, and outcomes associated with OHCAs in elderly patients were compared between 3 years pre-pandemic (2017-2019) and the pandemic year (2020). The primary outcome was neurologically favourable one-month survival. The secondary outcomes were the rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), defibrillation by a bystander, dispatcher-assisted (DA)-CPR attempts, and one-month survival. Results: During the pandemic year, the rates of neurologically favourable 1-month survival (crude odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 1.19, 1.14-1.25), bystander CPR (1.04, 1.03-1.06), and DA-CPR attempts (1.10, 1.08-1.11) increased, whereas the incidence of public access defibrillation (0.88, 0.83-0.93) decreased. Subgroup analyses based on interaction tests showed that the increased rate of neurologically favourable survival during the pandemic year was enhanced in OHCA at care facilities (1.51, 1.36-1.68) and diminished or abolished on state-of-emergency days (0.90, 0.74-1.09), in the mainly affected prefectures (1.08, 1.01-1.15), and in cases with shockable initial rhythms (1.03, 0.96-1.12). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the bystander CPR rate in association with enhanced DA-CPR attempts and improved the outcomes of elderly patients with OHCAs.